Philosopher William Lane Craig Skewers "Incoherence" of Humanism in WPost
Philosopher, author, and debater William Lane Craig writes:
The American Humanist Association is promoting a new Web site that is designed to furnish children with a naturalistic or atheistic perspective on science, sexuality, and other topics. The stated goal of the Web site is laudatory: “to encourage curiosity, critical thinking, and tolerance among young people, as well as to provide accurate information regarding a wide range of issues related to humanism, science, culture, and history.”
The problem is that those values have no inherent connection with naturalism, which is a philosophical viewpoint that holds that there is nothing beyond the physical contents of the universe. One doesn’t need to be a naturalist in order to endorse curiosity, critical thinking, tolerance, and the pursuit of accurate information on a wide range of topics.
Ironically, the AHA has been remarkably uncritical in thinking about the truth of naturalism and of humanism in particular.
"The new humanist Web site never encourages kids to think critically about the tough questions concerning the justification of humanism itself," Craig observes.
"Humanists tend to be condescendingly dismissive of theism and oblivious to nihilism," he concludes. "Meanwhile, they blithely extol the virtues of critical thinking, curiosity, and science, apparently unaware of the incoherence at the heart of their own worldview."
To visit William Lane Craig's website, go here.
Related
How Critical Thinking Saves Faith
Fascism Watch: Village Voice and Pro-Existence
Christmas Spirit in Space and Time: Good News Confronts Cults of Faith, Secularism, Religion, and Politics